I have never put too much stock in getting scouting reports from other people and planning too much about one particular opponent or a group of opponents heading into a tournament. For one thing, the majority of the tournament experience has more to do with getting your team better than trying to adjust your game plan to stop what someone else is doing. Not to say that through the early and middle parts of a season you are going to be playing in a vacuum paying no attention to the other team, but I'm not going to use up valuable practice time based on the playing style of a single opponent.
As the season moves forward into the UPA Series, game planning for particular opponents can have you looking past other opponents and that is a big negative. Preparing for a tournament like Regionals certainly leads to some discussion about the teams we might play, but the double elimination format and the fact that New England has a supreme amount of parity means that we don't end up playing the teams we thought we might going into the tournament...so again, why waste too much practice time?
Last year at Nationals we really knew nothing about the three teams in our pool (UBC, Carleton, Oregon) as we had never been to a tournament with any of them and we had never played any of them. In fact, we didn't play a team we had even been at a tournament with until our 6th and final game of the tournament when we played and beat Maryland (who we had lost two twice, the second time being a 15-4 drubbing) 15-3. So, again, heading into Nationals 2008 I focused on just doing what the team could to put forth our best effort. We went in with no perceived notions about how teams played and did our best to adjust as the tournament went along. We won no pool play games but did go 2-1 on Saturday to finish in 9th.
Heading into Nationals this year we have been at tournaments with three of the teams in our pool (Michigan, UCLA, St. Louis) and have even played UCLA thanks to being able to get to Presidents Day and Centex. In talking with other people we know and having watched some games and other video I've been able to piece together things about each of the four teams (Washington being the other) we know we will play. I shared my thoughts on my initial game plan with the team and we have been working on skills specific to the teams we know we will match up with in the past couple weeks. Having the players thinking about each match up will hopefully have them more mentally prepared to start games and also have them looking to make adjustments or observations independently of coaches as the games and tournament progress. I have never taken such an aggressive approach to preparing for a tournament and am interested to see if knowing and talking about things prior to the tournament will help us in anyway.
We are the 18 seed out of 20 as we get ready to head to Columbus. Teams will be looking past us and rightly so. I'm just looking to put forth the best effort we can and see how we stack up with the best of the best.
We'll see how this works out...
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Coaching with the big picture in mind
Quick preface: Jin asked me to give some of my thoughts on ultimate and as Northeastern has just won the NE Regional title for the second year in a row, my approach to our season seemed an appropriate topic. On paper finishing 3rd at Sectionals and 1st at Regionals doesn't make a whole lot of sense, and if asked to explain that my short answer would be that we played better at Regionals, but my bigger picture answer is that we weren't trying to win Sectionals, we were trying to win Regionals...
In my opinion there are two ways of going about trying to accomplish something: you either take what you have and try to make things work to meet your needs or you look at the entire situation and figure out how to get from where you are to where you want to be. These choices are true of most any aspect of life, but can be overlooked when trying to think about something like how to build a successful ultimate season. The Engineer in me always has me looking at the bigger picture and trying to figure out the most effective way to solve something even if the solution takes longer to figure out.
I am a very big proponent of formulating a team goal (even if that goal is just in my head and not fully expressed to the team) and then figuring out how the team can best accomplish that goal. Coming off a Nationals trip last season we were returning a lot of players but lost our two primary handlers as well as a couple complimentary role players. We still had a couple of our top players and we could have just focused the offense of the team completely around them, but I wanted to take a bigger approach to the season because my goal was to return to Nationals.
Throughout the fall and into the spring I made a point of trying to develop more handlers to fill the void of last year's team. I could have just plugged in our most experienced cutters (who also happen to have handling experience from past seasons) but I saw our team being stronger if we could develop more consistent play from our entire roster. I identified a group of about six players to audition for two or three open handler roles and spent the end of the fall and the first couple tournaments of the spring seeing how each of the players worked within our team. I knew that shuffling players around and asking players to take on bigger roles maybe before they were ready would mean that our play early in the season was not going to be as good as if I went with the more sure thing of leaning on the players I already trusted, but I also knew that the maximum potential of our team would be achieved if our top cutters could stay as our top cutters and we could develop new handlers.
Our performance at each of our pre-Series tournaments (President's Day, Long Island Classic, Centex) was lackluster at best from a results stand point and I know many of our players were frustrated by our play. But as the season moved along, I kept telling myself that our finish at these tournaments was not the most important thing; putting our best team on the field at Regionals was the most important thing. As long as the team and the individuals on the team were progressing we were putting ourselves in a better position to win at Regionals.
As Sectionals rolled around, we were battling a couple key injuries and trying to re-integrate a couple of key players coming back from injuries and moving the team along as a whole became more important than any individual game at the tournament. Sure we needed to qualify for Regionals first and foremost, but I didn't want to risk complicating any existing injuries or aggravating any past injuries by playing people that we could afford to have rest. Additionally, by sitting out some of our top players, other players on the team were forced to step into a greater role on the field. My thinking was that Sectionals was a testing ground for the entire roster and that when we put everything back together we would be better than we had been going into Sectionals. Once we clinched our birth to Regionals, I shut some more players down and we ended up stumbling to the aforementioned 3rd place finish.
The next step in the big picture was trying to build up the mental strength of the team to a point where we knew we could beat the teams (like Harvard and Tufts) that we had just lost to, and could play with the teams (like Dartmouth, Middlebury, Wesleyan, Brown, etc) that we had not yet seen. I made a big point to express my confidence in the team more than I usually do because I was looking at our roster as a whole and had a lot more faith in our players because of their individual play at Sectionals and other tournaments than I had at the beginning of the season.
At Regionals we played a consistent rotation of 14 players and had 16 players get playing time in the semis and finals. Our rotation seemed much bigger than other teams and allowed our top players to play 2 out of 3 points or 3 out of 4 points instead of 25 out of 25 points or 25 out of 28 points like the top players on other teams played. Because they had been in big spots, our entire roster was able to contribute and make plays and we emerged as the Regional champs.
I am not sure where we would have finished if our season was just built on the top 8 or 10 returning players from last year, but I am happy with how things turned out doing things the way we did.
A couple keys to coaching with the big picture in mind:
Communication - while the team may not need to know every minute detail of a coaches goal, having all of the players understand what the team is working for is vital. We didn't go to tournaments with a goal of winning said tournament, and we didn't approach any games with the goal that "we have to win this game". We saw our goal as playing the best ultimate we could at the end of the season, and the entire season we worked to improve towards that goal regardless of results. Players have to be willing to work through the entire season in order for a team to reach their potential, and making sure they understand how you plan to have them working all season is a great way to help insure that.
Losing Is OK - nobody wants to lose an individual battle or lose on purpose, but suffering team losses in moments that don't truly matter is fine. If you attack every point of every game to win that point and win that game, you will be limiting the roles you let people play and that will stunt their growth and along with that the growth of your team. Early in the season I often tell my handlers that they have to throw deep in their first 5 touches of the disc. These throws are often turns, and sometimes completely the wrong throw, but they build an experience and skill that will be useful later. I'll keep playing a particular defense even if we are not getting turns and I know we could with other defenses because we need to improve on things that we can't do well. If you have a big picture constructed in your head for where you want the team to get to you can more than afford to lose points or games early in the season to get closer to those goals.
Make Sure You Let People Play - working on something at practice is a very easy thing to do. There is no noticeable pressure, a mistake is simply a mistake, and you can talk things out as much as you want because you control the pace. But everything meaningful that your team is going to try to accomplish happens in real life games, against an opponent, where a mistake can mean the difference between you scoring you getting scored on, between winning and losing. So, letting people get game experience, and big game experience at that, will put them in the best position for success when the games you need to win are actually being played out and you want them on the field. This pretty much goes hand-in-hand with my comment about losing being OK, but I can't stress enough how important getting your entire roster onto the field in big moments of games instead of just riding your best players will help later in the season. And if you want someone to handle at a tournament in April, have them handle at a tournament in February, because February is the time for someone to mess up, for you to be there to help them, and for them to get better for when April rolls around.
Formulate and Trust Your Plan! - if you are a first year or very new coach, you may feel very overwhelmed by the thought of planning out an entire season before the season even starts, and frankly you should be overwhelmed by that thought. My first year coaching was spent working with what I had and trying to scrap for every point we could. As I got a handle on the team and got a feel for the game I began thinking more in terms of how to approach an entire game instead of one point, then how to approach an entire tournament instead of one game, and finally how to approach an entire season instead of just one tournament. This progression will take time, but keep your eyes and mind open to how you can do things better. I keep a notebook for random ideas I get about practice or game play and that helps me refine my big picture.
Once you have built up your confidence in yourself and your knowledge of the team, and you are willing to think ahead and plan for an entire season, you need to be able to trust yourself to carry out that plan. If you think the team is best with player X as a handler, and player X is not playing well, don't have them ride the bench, make them a better player by helping them improve their play. If you want six to eight players you can have run cup and at the front of the zone, and you can get lots of D's with persons A, B and C at the front of your zone, don't just have them play at the front of your zone, try persons D, E, and F because you want to build a deeper rotation. If you want a deep game to feature multiple threats so another team can't key up on your primary players and Star 1 can throw deep to Star 2 at will, don't put them on the field together and force Star 1 to create a Star 3 and Star 4 with their throws. If your goal is to be a fresher team on Sunday by playing a bigger rotation on Saturday and you get down 4-1 early don't shorten your rotation, stick with the plan for a big rotation and see if people can step up. If they can, you just built a ton of confidence. If they can't, work with them so that next time they can.
In my opinion there are two ways of going about trying to accomplish something: you either take what you have and try to make things work to meet your needs or you look at the entire situation and figure out how to get from where you are to where you want to be. These choices are true of most any aspect of life, but can be overlooked when trying to think about something like how to build a successful ultimate season. The Engineer in me always has me looking at the bigger picture and trying to figure out the most effective way to solve something even if the solution takes longer to figure out.
I am a very big proponent of formulating a team goal (even if that goal is just in my head and not fully expressed to the team) and then figuring out how the team can best accomplish that goal. Coming off a Nationals trip last season we were returning a lot of players but lost our two primary handlers as well as a couple complimentary role players. We still had a couple of our top players and we could have just focused the offense of the team completely around them, but I wanted to take a bigger approach to the season because my goal was to return to Nationals.
Throughout the fall and into the spring I made a point of trying to develop more handlers to fill the void of last year's team. I could have just plugged in our most experienced cutters (who also happen to have handling experience from past seasons) but I saw our team being stronger if we could develop more consistent play from our entire roster. I identified a group of about six players to audition for two or three open handler roles and spent the end of the fall and the first couple tournaments of the spring seeing how each of the players worked within our team. I knew that shuffling players around and asking players to take on bigger roles maybe before they were ready would mean that our play early in the season was not going to be as good as if I went with the more sure thing of leaning on the players I already trusted, but I also knew that the maximum potential of our team would be achieved if our top cutters could stay as our top cutters and we could develop new handlers.
Our performance at each of our pre-Series tournaments (President's Day, Long Island Classic, Centex) was lackluster at best from a results stand point and I know many of our players were frustrated by our play. But as the season moved along, I kept telling myself that our finish at these tournaments was not the most important thing; putting our best team on the field at Regionals was the most important thing. As long as the team and the individuals on the team were progressing we were putting ourselves in a better position to win at Regionals.
As Sectionals rolled around, we were battling a couple key injuries and trying to re-integrate a couple of key players coming back from injuries and moving the team along as a whole became more important than any individual game at the tournament. Sure we needed to qualify for Regionals first and foremost, but I didn't want to risk complicating any existing injuries or aggravating any past injuries by playing people that we could afford to have rest. Additionally, by sitting out some of our top players, other players on the team were forced to step into a greater role on the field. My thinking was that Sectionals was a testing ground for the entire roster and that when we put everything back together we would be better than we had been going into Sectionals. Once we clinched our birth to Regionals, I shut some more players down and we ended up stumbling to the aforementioned 3rd place finish.
The next step in the big picture was trying to build up the mental strength of the team to a point where we knew we could beat the teams (like Harvard and Tufts) that we had just lost to, and could play with the teams (like Dartmouth, Middlebury, Wesleyan, Brown, etc) that we had not yet seen. I made a big point to express my confidence in the team more than I usually do because I was looking at our roster as a whole and had a lot more faith in our players because of their individual play at Sectionals and other tournaments than I had at the beginning of the season.
At Regionals we played a consistent rotation of 14 players and had 16 players get playing time in the semis and finals. Our rotation seemed much bigger than other teams and allowed our top players to play 2 out of 3 points or 3 out of 4 points instead of 25 out of 25 points or 25 out of 28 points like the top players on other teams played. Because they had been in big spots, our entire roster was able to contribute and make plays and we emerged as the Regional champs.
I am not sure where we would have finished if our season was just built on the top 8 or 10 returning players from last year, but I am happy with how things turned out doing things the way we did.
A couple keys to coaching with the big picture in mind:
Communication - while the team may not need to know every minute detail of a coaches goal, having all of the players understand what the team is working for is vital. We didn't go to tournaments with a goal of winning said tournament, and we didn't approach any games with the goal that "we have to win this game". We saw our goal as playing the best ultimate we could at the end of the season, and the entire season we worked to improve towards that goal regardless of results. Players have to be willing to work through the entire season in order for a team to reach their potential, and making sure they understand how you plan to have them working all season is a great way to help insure that.
Losing Is OK - nobody wants to lose an individual battle or lose on purpose, but suffering team losses in moments that don't truly matter is fine. If you attack every point of every game to win that point and win that game, you will be limiting the roles you let people play and that will stunt their growth and along with that the growth of your team. Early in the season I often tell my handlers that they have to throw deep in their first 5 touches of the disc. These throws are often turns, and sometimes completely the wrong throw, but they build an experience and skill that will be useful later. I'll keep playing a particular defense even if we are not getting turns and I know we could with other defenses because we need to improve on things that we can't do well. If you have a big picture constructed in your head for where you want the team to get to you can more than afford to lose points or games early in the season to get closer to those goals.
Make Sure You Let People Play - working on something at practice is a very easy thing to do. There is no noticeable pressure, a mistake is simply a mistake, and you can talk things out as much as you want because you control the pace. But everything meaningful that your team is going to try to accomplish happens in real life games, against an opponent, where a mistake can mean the difference between you scoring you getting scored on, between winning and losing. So, letting people get game experience, and big game experience at that, will put them in the best position for success when the games you need to win are actually being played out and you want them on the field. This pretty much goes hand-in-hand with my comment about losing being OK, but I can't stress enough how important getting your entire roster onto the field in big moments of games instead of just riding your best players will help later in the season. And if you want someone to handle at a tournament in April, have them handle at a tournament in February, because February is the time for someone to mess up, for you to be there to help them, and for them to get better for when April rolls around.
Formulate and Trust Your Plan! - if you are a first year or very new coach, you may feel very overwhelmed by the thought of planning out an entire season before the season even starts, and frankly you should be overwhelmed by that thought. My first year coaching was spent working with what I had and trying to scrap for every point we could. As I got a handle on the team and got a feel for the game I began thinking more in terms of how to approach an entire game instead of one point, then how to approach an entire tournament instead of one game, and finally how to approach an entire season instead of just one tournament. This progression will take time, but keep your eyes and mind open to how you can do things better. I keep a notebook for random ideas I get about practice or game play and that helps me refine my big picture.
Once you have built up your confidence in yourself and your knowledge of the team, and you are willing to think ahead and plan for an entire season, you need to be able to trust yourself to carry out that plan. If you think the team is best with player X as a handler, and player X is not playing well, don't have them ride the bench, make them a better player by helping them improve their play. If you want six to eight players you can have run cup and at the front of the zone, and you can get lots of D's with persons A, B and C at the front of your zone, don't just have them play at the front of your zone, try persons D, E, and F because you want to build a deeper rotation. If you want a deep game to feature multiple threats so another team can't key up on your primary players and Star 1 can throw deep to Star 2 at will, don't put them on the field together and force Star 1 to create a Star 3 and Star 4 with their throws. If your goal is to be a fresher team on Sunday by playing a bigger rotation on Saturday and you get down 4-1 early don't shorten your rotation, stick with the plan for a big rotation and see if people can step up. If they can, you just built a ton of confidence. If they can't, work with them so that next time they can.
Player development
I remember when I first played club after graduating college. All the college kids would come back the next summer and they'd be leaps and bounds beyond where they were last season, and I felt like I'd made no progress whatsoever. Quite a shock. They were forced to play bigger roles on their college teams and therefore were able to develop all aspects of their game, and also given free rein to do so.
In the club season, it's harder to expand your game because (at least in the NE) there's a conservative mentality towards possession and playing within your role. I feel that it is short-sighted to train that way, but it is hard to balance the short-term decline in level of play which tends to be discouraging, with long-term improvement. And of course everyone wants to win.
One of my personal goals for Hatch is for every player to feel that she has improved, in some fashion, by the end of the season. It's too easy to pigeon-hole players into roles for the sake of early success, and then never get to work on the other aspects of one's game to bring up your overall level of play. I certainly could have done much better last year, and I think with a longer season this year and less pressure to establish ourselves as a "legitimate team" I'll get closer towards my goal.
I have been fixated (well, for the past few days at least) by having "show me your worst" practices. Most of the time, people like to do the things they do best - you look good and therefore you feel better by doing it.
I want to do the opposite.
I want my handlers to cut, my cutters to handle and my deep defenders marking up on handlers. I want my cup to play in the back in zone, and poppers to handle and wings to pop. I believe that cutters need to handle in order to know where they should be cutting, handlers should cut in order to understand the timing of cuts, and defenders need to think like the offense to know where the threats are.
It's not just that I want to make our general skill level higher (ie, better throwers, better receivers, better defenders) - I want to expand how my players see the field and get them to understand what the other positions see and are looking for. Efficiency comes when these 22-27 players all have the same expectations on the field and know what every other player is going to do, and that is what I strive to create.
In the club season, it's harder to expand your game because (at least in the NE) there's a conservative mentality towards possession and playing within your role. I feel that it is short-sighted to train that way, but it is hard to balance the short-term decline in level of play which tends to be discouraging, with long-term improvement. And of course everyone wants to win.
One of my personal goals for Hatch is for every player to feel that she has improved, in some fashion, by the end of the season. It's too easy to pigeon-hole players into roles for the sake of early success, and then never get to work on the other aspects of one's game to bring up your overall level of play. I certainly could have done much better last year, and I think with a longer season this year and less pressure to establish ourselves as a "legitimate team" I'll get closer towards my goal.
I have been fixated (well, for the past few days at least) by having "show me your worst" practices. Most of the time, people like to do the things they do best - you look good and therefore you feel better by doing it.
I want to do the opposite.
I want my handlers to cut, my cutters to handle and my deep defenders marking up on handlers. I want my cup to play in the back in zone, and poppers to handle and wings to pop. I believe that cutters need to handle in order to know where they should be cutting, handlers should cut in order to understand the timing of cuts, and defenders need to think like the offense to know where the threats are.
It's not just that I want to make our general skill level higher (ie, better throwers, better receivers, better defenders) - I want to expand how my players see the field and get them to understand what the other positions see and are looking for. Efficiency comes when these 22-27 players all have the same expectations on the field and know what every other player is going to do, and that is what I strive to create.
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Introducing Jason
I've been wanting to get some more voices on this blog for a while, and Jason Adams has generously agreed to share some of his knowledge and thoughts.
JYD has been the coach of the Northeastern women's team for the past few years, as well as the captain of Quiet Coyote and Metal club teams. He has recently contributed to The Huddle (see the Centex issue) and last weekend was leading the Northeastern women to their second Regionals win in as many years.
Jason is someone who I've long admired as a coach, and I am excited to have him join me on this blog. Look for him within the next week (I hope) and more to come in the future.
JYD has been the coach of the Northeastern women's team for the past few years, as well as the captain of Quiet Coyote and Metal club teams. He has recently contributed to The Huddle (see the Centex issue) and last weekend was leading the Northeastern women to their second Regionals win in as many years.
Jason is someone who I've long admired as a coach, and I am excited to have him join me on this blog. Look for him within the next week (I hope) and more to come in the future.
Friday, May 1, 2009
Thoughts as I'm planning tryouts
It's spring, which means the club season starts gearing up in the Northeast. Hatch has been planning tryouts for the past month or two, and I've got my practice plan all set for the first 2 weeks (open tryouts), and am working on the next 2 weeks. What is difficult right now is to determine how much redundancy to build into the plan. I don't expect that we'll be able to see everyone at every practice, which means that a lot of what we do has to either be fairly universal and basic, or that we need to review new or higher-level skills at multiple times during tryouts.
On the other hand, we are offering tryouts at times which should minimally conflict with other teams, and so I do expect that serious tryouts will be able to make most of the practices. Furthermore, I have big plans for the team this year, and we can't afford to delay building our new skills and working on our offenses/defenses for a month just to focus on basics. Sure, we could all use more work on fundamentals, but getting a newer team to gel together takes time and we need to be efficient about using our time together.
This is part of the reason why we declined doing combined open tryouts with Brute. There was initial appeal because we would be able to potentially see a larger group of women and it would also not force tryouts to choose between which tryout to attend. This is a format that is done elsewhere in the nation, and even the men's side in Boston is holding combined tryouts this year. But we have our own practice agenda to carry out, and we also felt that it would be hard to express our own team personality and to not be seen as a feeder team for Brute if we did combined tryouts. We are a legitimate 3rd option for women with a different experience to offer players; not a way-point or training ground on their way to play for Brute or Godiva.
I've had a number of people question whether the Boston metro-area can even support 3 competitive women's teams. Sure, we are on the smallish side of cities, but there are plenty of ultimate players - and colleges - in the area that feed into the ultimate scene. There has been an explosion in the number of women's programs in the local colleges, and I believe that having more women's club teams also help encourage and promote women's ultimate in this area (I looked around at Sectionals and every other team was coached by a Brute!), so I come down squarely on the side of the more the merrier.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
